Search the Site
| EVENT CALENDAR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 2008 | ||||||
| s | m | t | w | t | f | s |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Attention News Editors:
ANWR Caribou Maternity Ward Safe from Oil Drilling, For Now
TORONTO, Dec. 21 /CNW/ - THE LATEST - Today's vote in the US Senate not to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge of Alaska is an important short-term victory for wildlife and aboriginal peoples in both Canada and the United States. Conservationists demonstrated their influence and determination one more time.
Today's conservation win is a credit first and foremost to the efforts of the Gwich'in people who depend on the Porcupine caribou herd, the Government of Canada which has stood firm in its opposition to drilling, the Senators who in the end decided to do the right thing, and to conservation groups in both countries, including WWF-US, WWF-Canada and especially the Alaska Wilderness League.
This issue clearly put US politicians to the test, but it also raises questions for Canadian politicians, especially during a federal election:
- Canada has 15 barrenground caribou calving areas in its own country.
Of these, only three are protected in National Parks. In the
remainder, the federal government is allowing mineral exploration,
roads and other industrial development. So what are OUR leadership
candidates prepared to do to protect these for future generations of
northerners?
- What specifically will OUR candidates do to help aboriginal
communities reserve and protect areas important to them in advance of
industrial development, so that Canada doesn't have its own version of
the Refuge crisis?
- Pressure on natural areas such as the Refuge in Alaska and other
caribou habitats in Canada ultimately results from an out-dated
approach to energy consumption that depends too much on fossil fuels.
So, are OUR leaders prepared to develop a sustainable energy policy
for Canada that puts new emphasis on energy conservation, greater
efficiency, and renewable sources?
THE QUOTE - "Although we won today, we shouldn't have even been put into the position of yet another cliffhanger. Conservationists have had to fend off drilling in the Refuge many times over the last 25 years, despite the fact that the majority of both Canadians and Americans do not want this to happen. Now we need to move beyond these defensive actions, to provide permanent protection to a North American natural treasure," said Monte Hummel, President Emeritus, WWF-Canada. "Without a clear, sustainable energy policy that moves away from dependence on fossil fuels, conservationists will always be fighting a rear-guard action against the destruction of ecologically crucial places like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge."
BACKGROUND - More than 40 years ago, scientists and conservationists who fought to establish the Arctic Refuge envisioned preserving an undisturbed portion of America's Arctic that was large enough to be biologically self- sufficient. Of particular concern was protection of the entire range of the Porcupine caribou herd, whose range is partly in the United States and partly in Canada. For over 20 years, oil companies have been lobbying for the right to build hundreds of miles of pipelines, roads, drilling pads, gravel mines, and other industrial facilities in the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
The WWF global-family has been engaged in protecting wildlife in Alaska for more than three decades. In recent years, WWF-US activists have sent 175,000 letters and made thousands of phone calls to their representatives in Congress urging that the Refuge's coastal plain be protected in the National Wilderness Preservation System. And, WWF-Canada recently obtained 77,000 petitions that were personally delivered to Prime Minister Paul Martin in support of the Canadian government's position against drilling in the Refuge.
ISSUES
Canadian and Alaskan Aboriginal communities north of the Arctic Circle depend on the Porcupine Caribou Herd for their sustenance and cultural needs. The most important calving grounds for this migratory herd are in the Arctic Refuge, Alaska. Canada has permanently protected from development the lands in Canada used by the herd for calving, and continues to urge that the U.S. do the same. This would be consistent with the commitment to protect and conserve the herd and its habitat in the 1987 Canada-U.S. Agreement on the Conservation of the Porcupine Caribou Herd.
Key points:
- Research overwhelmingly shows that oil development in the Arctic
Refuge will endanger the Porcupine caribou herd. Unlike some northern
caribou, they have no viable alternative calving grounds.
- The Gwich'in First Nation and other Aboriginal Peoples depend on the
herd for their sustenance, culture and way of life.
- The Refuge, including the coastal plain, is a world-class natural area
with incomparable and irreplaceable ecological, scientific, historic,
and educational values for the North American people.
For further information: Wendy Douglas, Manager, Communications,
WWF-Canada at (416) 484-7726 or wdouglas@wwfcanada.org
Topic(s): Energy News, Enviro News Releases, Member News , parks and wilderness news, Wildlife News
Posted By EcoBC
RSS
More News Release Articles